New Jeep Review

2009 Jeep Compass

Tuesday 18 June 2013


2009 Jeep Compass

Car: 2009 Jeep Compass Review


2009 Jeep Compass



This Jeep is outclassed by other compact SUVs that offer much better performance, the most beautiful interiors, highest reliability ratings and performance of crash test.

2009 Jeep Compass



Even if it's a Jeep, this Jeep is much better suited for comfort around town trails crushing. While some commentators thought the 2009 Jeep Compass has sufficient power, others believe that it is seriously underpowered. Compass offers only a four-cylinder engine that gets good fuel economy up to 23/29 mpg city / highway when equipped with 2-wheel drive and manual transmission. In handling ability, the 2009 Jeep Compass is surprisingly well composed on the streets or highways, but on bumpy terrain, the Compass is debate as auto critics. The compass Reliability who are overwhelmed by many of its rivals and poor security.

2009 Jeep Compass

Most commentators thought other compact SUVs in 2009 had more fun than the Compass interiors, and many complained of engine noise makes its way into the cabin. However, critics of the car said that the compass was spacious and had comfortable front seats with good visibility, but I found that the rear seats were uncomfortable. And reviewers found reason to recommend the compass of the competition.

Other cars to consider :
If you like the 2009 Jeep Compass to its robust reputation, you may also like the 2009 Subaru Forester. While the Forester and Compass have similar reliability ratings, the Forester has much better scores in safety and quality interior. In addition, the Forester is a better performer and comes standard with four-wheel drive.

You should consider the 2009 Ford Escape if you want to increase the load capacity and high scores security of the compass. The 2009 Jeep Compass has a reliability comparable, but the Escape is a better performer.

Advantages and disadvantages :

  • Good fuel economy
  • Interior materials Subpar
  • The lack of off-road capability
  • Low cargo capacity for the class
  • Back seats are uncomfortable


Scores of cars :
  • Overall: 6.9
  • Rating Review: 6.4
  • Performance: 7.0
  • Interior: 6.5
  • Cost of operation: 7.7
  • Safety: 8.5






 

Contact Us

Popular Posts